us digital dollar project Top

Judging from the rise in these directions, I think it is very simple for investors now. Just do the following:Today, it is actually very consistent with the characteristics of institutional efforts, because chasing up and down is the characteristic of many retail investors, but institutions generally regard retail investors as their own opponents.For retail investors, today is still more suitable for holding shares to rise. If you bought yesterday, you don't have to worry about it in the short term. As long as you follow the above-mentioned directions of technology, consumption and real estate, at least the policy is supportive, and it is not chasing high in the short term.

Everyone still tries to choose the direction of holding shares and wait patiently for the policy to be fulfilled.Seeing that today's liquor, medicine, food and beverage, real estate, coal, and semiconductors have all risen, these have dividend stocks, policy support directions, and institutional shareholding, which all opened higher yesterday.Now it is the hope of the above that the stock market will rise, and that technology and consumption will rise. This is not difficult to understand. What is difficult is whether you have the patience and confidence to hold these.

The plates were those that opened higher yesterday, and they have been further repaired today. At the end of the year, don't always think about chasing the daily limit, low-level consumer medicine, and the industry's low valuation leader, holding it steadily in the cyclical direction.Because yesterday, when the mood was the highest, it was inevitable that the turnover would be enlarged. Today, everyone has calmed down, and the volume will drop. Everyone's willingness to trade is not so strong. Some major institutions have done more by themselves. Typically, they don't want everyone to make money.(3) Third, some institutions have started to work today, and consumption, medicine, real estate, and semiconductors have all increased. These are all obvious institutional styles.